Following the discussion in #1195 this is the best I could come up with.
The issue for me (and apparently a few other learners) was that the code
needed to complete the exercise was not _missing_, but was rather there
but wrong.
In the end, what made the difference between this exercise and others
(for me) was that in this exercise I was supposed to learn what to
*expect* of an output. So I think it makes sense here to let the learner
modify the tests and not the code itself.
Fixes#1195
Signed-off-by: Daan Wynen <black.puppydog@gmx.de>
# Conflicts:
# info.toml
Missed a blank line, which causes the prompt incorrect like below:
```rust
You can keep working on this exercise,
or jump into the next one by removing the `I AM NOT DONE` comment:
6 | // Make this code compile by using the proper Rc primitives to express that the sun has multiple owners.
7 |
8 | // I AM NOT DONE
9 | use std::rc::Rc;
```
Daan Wynen