perrotuerto.blog/old/content/pot/001_free-publishing.pot

178 lines
8.2 KiB
Plaintext

#, fuzzy
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: 001_free-publishing 1.0\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya <nika.zhenya@cliteratu.re>\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-20 13:30-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Nika Zhenya <nika.zhenya@cliteratu.re>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:1
msgid "# From publishing with free software to free publishing"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:2
msgid ""
"This blog is about “free publishing” but, what does that means? The term "
"“free” it isn't only problematic in English. May be more than in others "
"languages because of the confusion between “free as in beer” and “free as in "
"speech.” But by itself the concept of freedom is so ambiguous than even in "
"Philosophy we are very careful in its use. Even though it is a problem, I "
"like that the term doesn't have a clear definition---at the end, how free "
"could we be if freedom is well defined?"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:9
msgid ""
"Some years ago, when I started to work hand-in-hand with Programando "
"Libreros and Hacklib I realized that we weren't just doing publishing with "
"free software. We are doing free publishing. So I attempted to defined it in "
"[a post](https://marianaeguaras.com/edicion-libre-mas-alla-creative-"
"commons/) but it doesn't convince me anymore."
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:14
msgid ""
"The term was floating around until December, 2018. At Contracorriente---"
"yearly fanzine fair celebrated in Xalapa, Mexico---Hacklib and me were "
"invited to give a talk about publishing and free software. Between all of us "
"we made a poster of everything we talked that day."
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:18
msgid ""
"![Poster made at Contracorriente, nice, isn't it?](../../../img/p001_i001."
"jpg)"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:19
msgid ""
"The poster was very helpful because in a simple Venn diagram we were able to "
"distinguish several intersections of activities that involves our work. Here "
"you have it more readable:"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:22
msgid ""
"![Venn diagram of publishing, free software and politics](../../../img/"
"p001_i002.png)"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:23
msgid ""
"So I'm not gonna define what is publishing, free software or politics---it "
"is my fucking blog so I can write whatever I want xD and you can [duckduckgo]"
"(https://duckduckgo.com/?q=I+dislike+google) it without a satisfactory "
"answer. But as you can see, there are at least two very familiar "
"intersections: cultural policies and hacktivism. I dunno how it is in your "
"country, but in Mexico we have very strong cultural policies for "
"publishing---or at least that is what publishers _think_ and are "
"comfortable, not matter that most of the times they go against open access "
"and readers. “Hacktivism” is a fuzzy term, but it could be clear if we "
"realized that code as property is not the only way we can define it. "
"Actually it is very problematic because property isn't a natural right, but "
"one that is produced by our societies and protected by our states---yeah, "
"individuality isn't the foundation of rights and laws, but a construction of "
"the self produced society. So, do I have to mention that property rights "
"isn't as fair as we would want?"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:37
msgid ""
"Between publishing and free software we get “publishing with free software.” "
"What does that implies? It is the activity of publishing using software that "
"accomplish the famous---infamous?---[four freedoms](https://en.wikipedia.org/"
"wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition). For people that use software as a tool, "
"this means that, firstly, we aren't force to pay anything in order to use "
"software. Secondly, we have access to the code and do whatever we want with "
"it. Thirdly---and for me the most important---we can be part of a community, "
"instead of be treated as a consumer."
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:44
msgid ""
"It sounds great, isn't it? But we have a little problem: the freedom only "
"applies to software. As publisher you can benefit from free software and "
"that doesn't mean you have to free your work. Penguin Random House---the "
"Google of publishing---one day could decided to use TeX or Pandoc, saving "
"tons of money at the same time they keep the monopoly of publishing."
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:49
msgid ""
"Stallman saw that problem with the manuals published by O'Reilly and he "
"proposed the GNU Free Documentation License. But by doing so he trickly "
"distinguished [different kinds of works](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/"
"copyright-and-globalization.en.html). It is interesting see texts as "
"functionality, matter of opinion or aesthetics but in the publishing "
"industry nobody cares a fuck about that. The distinctions works great "
"between writers and readers, but it doesn't problematize the fact that "
"publishers are the ones who decide the path of almost all our text-centered "
"culture."
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:57
msgid ""
"In my opinion, that's dangerous at least. So I prefer other tricky "
"distinction. Big publishers and their mimetic branch---the so called “indie” "
"publishing---only cares about two things: sells and reputation. They want to "
"live _well_ and get social recognition from the _good_ books they publish. "
"If one day the software communities develop some desktop publishing or "
"typesetting easy-to-use and suitable for all their _professional_ needs, we "
"would see how “suddenly” publishing industry embraces free software."
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:64
msgid ""
"So, why don't we distinguish published works by their funding and sense of "
"community? If what you publishing has public funding---for your knowledge, "
"in Mexico practically all publishing has this kind of funding---it would be "
"fair to release the files and leave hard copies for sell: we already pay for "
"that. This is a very common argument among supporters of open access in "
"science, but we can go beyond that. Not matter if the work relies on "
"functionality, matter of opinion or aesthetics; if is a science paper, a "
"philosophy essay or a novel and it has public funding, we have pay for the "
"access, come on!"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:72
msgid ""
"You can still sell publications and go to Messe Frankfurt, Guadalajara "
"International Book Fair or Beijing Book Fair: it is just doing business with "
"the _bare minium_ of social and political awareness. Why do you want more "
"money from us if we already gave it to you?---and you get almost all the "
"profits, leaving the authors with just the satisfaction of seeing her work "
"published…"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:77
msgid ""
"The sense of community goes here. In a world where one of the main problems "
"is artificial scarcity---paywalls instead of actual walls---we need to apply "
"[copyleft](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/copyleft.en.html) or, even better, "
"[copyfarleft](http://telekommunisten.net/the-telekommunist-manifesto/) "
"licenses in our published works. They aren't the solution, but they are a "
"support to maintain the freedom and the access in publishing."
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:83
msgid ""
"As it goes, we need free tools but also free works. I already have the tools "
"but I lack from permission to publish some books that I really like. I don't "
"want that happen to you with my work. So we need a publishing ecosystem "
"where we have access to all files of a particular edition---our source code "
"and binary files--- and also to the tools---the free software---so we can "
"improve, as a community, the quality and access of the works. Who doesn't "
"want that?"
msgstr ""
#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:89
msgid ""
"With these politics strains, free software tools and publishing as a way of "
"living as a publisher, writer and reader, free publishing is a pathway. With "
"Programando Libreros and Hacklib we use free software, we invest time in "
"activism and we work in publishing: _we do free publishing, what about you?_ "
msgstr ""