From a953de89ab6e5d812008f3ddefbe61b7dc54efad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nika Zhenya Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 21:40:34 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Lang=20nb=5FNO=20added=20under=20request=20of?= =?UTF-8?q?=20Allan=20Nordh=C3=B8y?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- content/po/nb/001_free-publishing.po | 181 +++++++++++++++ content/po/nb/002_fuck-books.po | 119 ++++++++++ content/po/nb/003_dont_come.po | 322 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ content/po/nb/_about.po | 75 +++++++ content/po/nb/_contact.po | 32 +++ content/po/nb/_donate.po | 48 ++++ content/po/nb/_fork.po | 60 +++++ content/po/nb/_links.po | 30 +++ 8 files changed, 867 insertions(+) create mode 100644 content/po/nb/001_free-publishing.po create mode 100644 content/po/nb/002_fuck-books.po create mode 100644 content/po/nb/003_dont_come.po create mode 100644 content/po/nb/_about.po create mode 100644 content/po/nb/_contact.po create mode 100644 content/po/nb/_donate.po create mode 100644 content/po/nb/_fork.po create mode 100644 content/po/nb/_links.po diff --git a/content/po/nb/001_free-publishing.po b/content/po/nb/001_free-publishing.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..673f91c --- /dev/null +++ b/content/po/nb/001_free-publishing.po @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ +msgid "" +msgstr "" +"Project-Id-Version: 001_free-publishing 1.0\n" +"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya \n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-20 13:30-0600\n" +"MIME-Version: 1.0\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" +"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: \n" +"Language-Team: \n" +"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n" +"Last-Translator: \n" +"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" +"Language: nb_NO\n" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:1 +msgid "# From publishing with free software to free publishing" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:2 +msgid "" +"This blog is about “free publishing” but, what does that means? The term " +"“free” it isn't only problematic in English. May be more than in others " +"languages because of the confusion between “free as in beer” and “free as in " +"speech.” But by itself the concept of freedom is so ambiguous than even in " +"Philosophy we are very careful in its use. Even though it is a problem, I " +"like that the term doesn't have a clear definition---at the end, how free " +"could we be if freedom is well defined?" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:9 +msgid "" +"Some years ago, when I started to work hand-in-hand with Programando " +"Libreros and Hacklib I realized that we weren't just doing publishing with " +"free software. We are doing free publishing. So I attempted to defined it in " +"[a post](https://marianaeguaras.com/edicion-libre-mas-alla-creative-" +"commons/) but it doesn't convince me anymore." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:14 +msgid "" +"The term was floating around until December, 2018. At Contracorriente---" +"yearly fanzine fair celebrated in Xalapa, Mexico---Hacklib and me were " +"invited to give a talk about publishing and free software. Between all of us " +"we made a poster of everything we talked that day." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:18 +msgid "" +"![Poster made at Contracorriente, nice, isn't it?](../../../img/p001_i001." +"jpg)" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:19 +msgid "" +"The poster was very helpful because in a simple Venn diagram we were able to " +"distinguish several intersections of activities that involves our work. Here " +"you have it more readable:" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:22 +msgid "" +"![Venn diagram of publishing, free software and politics](../../../img/" +"p001_i002.png)" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:23 +msgid "" +"So I'm not gonna define what is publishing, free software or politics---it " +"is my fucking blog so I can write whatever I want xD and you can [duckduckgo]" +"(https://duckduckgo.com/?q=I+dislike+google) it without a satisfactory " +"answer. But as you can see, there are at least two very familiar " +"intersections: cultural policies and hacktivism. I dunno how it is in your " +"country, but in Mexico we have very strong cultural policies for " +"publishing---or at least that is what publishers _think_ and are " +"comfortable, not matter that most of the times they go against open access " +"and readers. “Hacktivism” is a fuzzy term, but it could be clear if we " +"realized that code as property is not the only way we can define it. " +"Actually it is very problematic because property isn't a natural right, but " +"one that is produced by our societies and protected by our states---yeah, " +"individuality isn't the foundation of rights and laws, but a construction of " +"the self produced society. So, do I have to mention that property rights " +"isn't as fair as we would want?" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:37 +msgid "" +"Between publishing and free software we get “publishing with free software.” " +"What does that implies? It is the activity of publishing using software that " +"accomplish the famous---infamous?---[four freedoms](https://en.wikipedia.org/" +"wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition). For people that use software as a tool, " +"this means that, firstly, we aren't force to pay anything in order to use " +"software. Secondly, we have access to the code and do whatever we want with " +"it. Thirdly---and for me the most important---we can be part of a community, " +"instead of be treated as a consumer." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:44 +msgid "" +"It sounds great, isn't it? But we have a little problem: the freedom only " +"applies to software. As publisher you can benefit from free software and " +"that doesn't mean you have to free your work. Penguin Random House---the " +"Google of publishing---one day could decided to use TeX or Pandoc, saving " +"tons of money at the same time they keep the monopoly of publishing." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:49 +msgid "" +"Stallman saw that problem with the manuals published by O'Reilly and he " +"proposed the GNU Free Documentation License. But by doing so he trickly " +"distinguished [different kinds of works](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/" +"copyright-and-globalization.en.html). It is interesting see texts as " +"functionality, matter of opinion or aesthetics but in the publishing " +"industry nobody cares a fuck about that. The distinctions works great " +"between writers and readers, but it doesn't problematize the fact that " +"publishers are the ones who decide the path of almost all our text-centered " +"culture." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:57 +msgid "" +"In my opinion, that's dangerous at least. So I prefer other tricky " +"distinction. Big publishers and their mimetic branch---the so called “indie” " +"publishing---only cares about two things: sells and reputation. They want to " +"live _well_ and get social recognition from the _good_ books they publish. " +"If one day the software communities develop some desktop publishing or " +"typesetting easy-to-use and suitable for all their _professional_ needs, we " +"would see how “suddenly” publishing industry embraces free software." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:64 +msgid "" +"So, why don't we distinguish published works by their funding and sense of " +"community? If what you publishing has public funding---for your knowledge, " +"in Mexico practically all publishing has this kind of funding---it would be " +"fair to release the files and leave hard copies for sell: we already pay for " +"that. This is a very common argument among supporters of open access in " +"science, but we can go beyond that. Not matter if the work relies on " +"functionality, matter of opinion or aesthetics; if is a science paper, a " +"philosophy essay or a novel and it has public funding, we have pay for the " +"access, come on!" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:72 +msgid "" +"You can still sell publications and go to Messe Frankfurt, Guadalajara " +"International Book Fair or Beijing Book Fair: it is just doing business with " +"the _bare minium_ of social and political awareness. Why do you want more " +"money from us if we already gave it to you?---and you get almost all the " +"profits, leaving the authors with just the satisfaction of seeing her work " +"published…" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:77 +msgid "" +"The sense of community goes here. In a world where one of the main problems " +"is artificial scarcity---paywalls instead of actual walls---we need to apply " +"[copyleft](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/copyleft.en.html) or, even better, " +"[copyfarleft](http://telekommunisten.net/the-telekommunist-manifesto/) " +"licenses in our published works. They aren't the solution, but they are a " +"support to maintain the freedom and the access in publishing." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:83 +msgid "" +"As it goes, we need free tools but also free works. I already have the tools " +"but I lack from permission to publish some books that I really like. I don't " +"want that happen to you with my work. So we need a publishing ecosystem " +"where we have access to all files of a particular edition---our source code " +"and binary files--- and also to the tools---the free software---so we can " +"improve, as a community, the quality and access of the works. Who doesn't " +"want that?" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/001_free-publishing.js:89 +msgid "" +"With these politics strains, free software tools and publishing as a way of " +"living as a publisher, writer and reader, free publishing is a pathway. With " +"Programando Libreros and Hacklib we use free software, we invest time in " +"activism and we work in publishing: _we do free publishing, what about you?_ " +msgstr "" diff --git a/content/po/nb/002_fuck-books.po b/content/po/nb/002_fuck-books.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e9c275c --- /dev/null +++ b/content/po/nb/002_fuck-books.po @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +msgid "" +msgstr "" +"Project-Id-Version: 002_fuck-books 1.0\n" +"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya \n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-04-15 11:22-0500\n" +"MIME-Version: 1.0\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" +"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: \n" +"Language-Team: \n" +"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n" +"Last-Translator: \n" +"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" +"Language: nb_NO\n" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:1 +msgid "# Fuck Books, If and only If…" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:2 +msgid "> @published 2019/04/15, 12:00 {.published}" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:3 +msgid "" +"I always try to be very clear about something: books nowadays, by " +"themselves, are just production leftovers. Yeah, we have built an industry " +"in order to made them. But, would you be able to publish by your own?" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:7 +msgid "" +"Probably not. It is almost sure you lack of something: you don't seize the " +"machines supposedly needed; you don't enjoy the skills; you don't carry the " +"acknowledge or you don't possess the networking. You don't own anything." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:11 +msgid "" +"We have reach the production capacity to publish in a couple hours what in " +"the past took centuries. That is amazing… and scary. What are we publishing " +"now? _Why are we producing that much?_ Our reading capacity haven't improve " +"at the same rhythm ---maybe we have been losing some of that ability." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:16 +msgid "" +"We are more people now, but it is a contemporary supposition that each " +"person needs a book. We have public libraries. They used to be a great idea. " +"Now they are one of the few places where people can go and enjoy without " +"paying a penny. The last standing point of a world before its global " +"monetization. And sometimes not even that, because they are behind a " +"paywall: paid subscriptions or universities ids; or because most of us " +"prefer coffee shops, public libraries are for poor, creepy and old people, " +"right?" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:24 +msgid "" +"And we are praising books as a holly product of our culture. Even though " +"what we really do is supporting a consumer good. You don't made them, you " +"don't read them: you just buy and put them in a bookshelf. You don't own " +"them, you don't even look what is inside: you just buy and leave them in " +"your Amazon account. You are a consumer and that makes you think yourself as " +"a supporter of our culture." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:31 +msgid "" +"As publishers we made everything about books: fairs, workshops, meetups, " +"study degrees and marketing. As publishers we want to sell you the next best-" +"seller, the newest book format: the future of reading. Even though what we " +"really want is your money. We know you don't read. We know you don't want " +"books that would blow the bubble where you live. We know you just want be " +"entertained. We know you are craving about how much books you have “read.” " +"We just want you to keep buying and buying. Who cares about you." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:39 +msgid "" +"Before all that shit happened to publishing, books were a rare and difficult " +"product to make. From them we could see the complexity of our world: its " +"means of production, its structure and its struggles. Publishers were kill " +"because they wanted to offer you something really important to read. Now " +"publishers are awarded with trips, grants or fancy dinners. Most publishers " +"aren't a treat anymore. Instead, they are the managers of public debate; " +"aka, what we can say, think or feel." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:47 +msgid "" +"Most books nowadays only show how the main bits of our world have been " +"displaced as another good in the marketplace. We see paper, we see ink, we " +"see fonts and we see code. After that first look, we start to realize that " +"our books are mainly a gear of a machinery of global consumption." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:52 +msgid "" +"Only at this point, we can clearly see the chain of exploitation needed to " +"achieve that kind of productivity. _Who or what benefits from it?_ Authors " +"can't made a living anymore. People involved in books production ---" +"printers, proof readers, designers, publishers and so on--- barely earn a " +"living wage. A lot of trees and resources have been use for profits." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:58 +msgid "" +"Again, we have reach the production capacity to publish in a couple hours " +"what in the past took centuries, _where did that wealth go?_ Not to our " +"pockets, we always have to pay in order to produce or own books." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/002_fuck-books.js:62 +msgid "" +"So, what makes you love books that probably you won't read? If and only if " +"publishing is what it is now and we don't want to change it, well: fuck " +"books. " +msgstr "" diff --git a/content/po/nb/003_dont_come.po b/content/po/nb/003_dont_come.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6b4667b --- /dev/null +++ b/content/po/nb/003_dont_come.po @@ -0,0 +1,322 @@ +msgid "" +msgstr "" +"Project-Id-Version: 003_dont_come 1.0\n" +"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya \n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-05-05 19:38-0500\n" +"MIME-Version: 1.0\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" +"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: \n" +"Language-Team: \n" +"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n" +"Last-Translator: \n" +"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" +"Language: nb_NO\n" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:1 +msgid "# Don't come with those tales" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:2 +msgid "> @published 2019/05/05, 20:00 {.published}" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:3 +msgid "" +"I love books. I love them so much that I even decided to make a living from " +"them---probably a very bad career decision. But I can't idealize that love." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:6 +msgid "" +"During school and university I was taught that I should love books. " +"Actually, some teachers made me clear that it was the only way I could get " +"my bachelor's degree. Because books are the main freedom and knowledge " +"device in our shitty world, right? Not loving books is like the will to stay " +"in a cave---hello, Plato. Not celebrating its greatness is just one step to " +"support antidemocratic regimes. And while I was learning to love books, of " +"course I also learn to respect its “creators” and the industry than made it " +"happened." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:15 +msgid "" +"I don't think it is casual that the development of what we mean by book is " +"independent from the developments of capitalism and what we understand by " +"author. Maybe correlation; maybe intersection; but definitely not separates " +"stories." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:19 +msgid "" +"Let's start with a common place: the invention of printing. Yeah, it is an " +"arbitrary and problematic start. We could say that books and authors goes " +"far before that. But what we have in that particularly place in history is " +"the standardization and massification of a practice. It didn't happen from " +"day to night, but little by little all the methodological and technical " +"diversity became more homogeneous. And with that, we were able to made books " +"not as luxury or institutional commodities, but as objects of everyday use." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:28 +msgid "" +"And not just books, but printed text in general. Before the invention of " +"printing, we could barely see text in our surroundings. What surprise me " +"about printing it is not the capacity of production that we reached, but how " +"that technology normalized the existence of text in our daily basis." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:33 +msgid "" +"Newspapers first and now social media relies on that normalization to " +"generate the idea of an “universal” public debate---I don't know if it is " +"actually “public” if almost all popular newspapers and social media " +"platforms are own by corporations and its criteria; but let's pretend it is " +"a minor issue. And public debate supposedly incentivizes democracy." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:39 +msgid "" +"Before Enlightenment the owners of printed text realized its freedom " +"potential. Most churches and kingdoms tried to control it. The Protestant " +"Church first and then the Enlightenment and emerging capitalist enterprises " +"hijacked the control of public debate; specifically who owns the means of " +"printed text production, who decides the languages worthy to print and who " +"sets its main reader." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:46 +msgid "" +"Maybe it is a bad analogy but printed text in newspapers, books and journals " +"were so fascinating like nowadays is digital “content” over the Internet. " +"But what I mean is that there were many people who tried to have that " +"control and power. And most of them failed and keep failing." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:51 +msgid "" +"So during 18th century books started to have another meaning. They ceased to " +"be mainly devices of God's or authority's word to be _a_ device of freedom " +"of speech. Thanks to the firsts emerging capitalists we got means for " +"secular thinking. Acts of censorship became evident acts of political " +"restriction instead of acts against sinners." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:57 +msgid "" +"The invention of printing created so big demand of printed text that it " +"actually generated the publishing industry. Self-publishing to satisfy " +"internal institutional demand opened the place to an industry for new " +"citizens readers. A luxury and religious object became a commodity in the " +"“free” market." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:62 +msgid "" +"While printed text surpassed almost all restrictions, freedom of speech " +"rised hand-to-hand freedom of enterprise---the debate between Free Software " +"Movement and Open Source Initiative relies in an old and more general " +"debate: how much freedom can we grant in order to secure freedom? But it " +"also developed other freedom that was fastened by religious or political " +"authorities: the freedom to be identify as an author." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:69 +msgid "" +"How we understand authorship in our days depends in a process where the " +"notion of author became more closed to the idea of “creator.” And it is " +"actually a very interesting semantic transfer. _In one way_ the invention of " +"printing mechanized and improved a practice that it was believed to be done " +"with God's help. Trithemius got so horrified that printing wasn't welcome. " +"But with new Spirits---freedoms of enterprise and speech---what was seen " +"even as a demonic invention became one of the main technologies that still " +"defines and reproduces the idea of humanity." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:78 +msgid "" +"This opened the opportunity to independent authors. Printed text wasn't " +"anymore a matter of God's or authority's word but a secular and more " +"ephemeral Human's word. The massification of publishing also opened the " +"gates for less relevant and easy-to-read printed texts; but for the " +"incipient publishing industry it didn't matter: it was a way to catch more " +"profits and consumers." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:84 +msgid "" +"Not only that, it reproduces the ideas that were around over and over again. " +"Yes, it growth the diversity of ideas but it also repeated speeches that " +"safeguard the state of things. How much books have been a device of freedom " +"and how much they have been a device of ideological reproduction? That is a " +"good question that we have to answer." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:90 +msgid "" +"So authors without religious or political authority found a way to sneak " +"their names in printed text. It wasn't yet a function of property---I don't " +"like the word “function,” but I will use it anyways---but a function of " +"attribution: they wanted to publicly be know as the human who wrote those " +"texts. No God, no authority, no institution, but a person of flesh and bone." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:96 +msgid "" +"But that also meant regular powerless people. Without backup of God or King, " +"who the fucks are you, little peasant? Publishers---a.k.a. printers in those " +"years---took advantage. The fascination to saw a newspaper article about " +"books you wrote is similar to see a Wikipedia article about you. You don't " +"gain directly anything, only reputation. It relies on you to made it " +"profitable." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:102 +msgid "" +"During 18th century, authorship became a function of _individual_ " +"attribution, but not a function of property. So I think that is were the " +"notion of “creator” came out as an ace in the hole. In Germany we can track " +"one of the first robust attempts to empower this new kind of powerless " +"independent author." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:107 +msgid "" +"German Romanticism developed something that goes back to the Renaissance: " +"humans can also _create_ things. Sometimes we forget that Christianity has " +"been also a very messy set of beliefs. The attempt to made a consistent, " +"uniform and rationalized set of beliefs goes back in the diversity of " +"religious practices. So you could accept that printing text lost its " +"directly connection to God's word while you could argue some kind of " +"indirectly inspiration beyond our corporeal world. And you don't have to " +"rationalize it: you can't prove it, you just feel it and know it." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:116 +msgid "" +"So german writers used that as foundations for independent authorship. No " +"God's or authority's word, no institution, but a person inspired by things " +"beyond our world. The notion of “creation” has a very strong religious and " +"metaphysical backgrounds that we can't just ignore them: act of creation " +"means the capacity to bring to this world something that it didn't belong to " +"it. The relationship between authorship and text turned out so imminent that " +"even nowadays we don't have any fucking idea why we accept as common sense " +"that authors have a superior and inalienable bond to its works." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:126 +msgid "" +"But before the expansionism of German Romanticism notion of author, writers " +"were seen more as producers that sold their work to the owners of means of " +"production. So while the invention of printing facilitated a new kind of " +"secular and independent author, _in other hand_ it summoned Authorship Fog: " +"“Whenever you cast another Book spell, if Spirits of Printing is in the " +"command zone or on the battlefield, create a 1/1 white Author creature token " +"with flying and indestructible.” As material as a printed card we made magic " +"to grant authors a creative function: the ability to “produce from nothing” " +"and a bond that never dies or changes." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:136 +msgid "" +"Authors as creators is a cool metaphor, who doesn't want to have some divine " +"powers? In the abstract discussion about the relationship between authors, " +"texts and freedom of speech, it is just a perfect fit. You don't have to " +"rely in anything material to grasp all of them as an unique phenomena. But " +"in the concrete facts of printed texts and the publishers abuse to authors " +"you go beyond attribution. You are not just linking an object to a subject. " +"Instead, you are grating property relationships between subject and an " +"object." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:145 +msgid "" +"And property means nothing if you can't exploit it. At the beginning of " +"publishing industry and during all 18th century, publishers took advantage " +"of this new kind of “property.” The invention of the author as a property " +"function was the rise of new legislation. Germans and French jurists " +"translated this speech to laws." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:150 +msgid "" +"I won't talk about the history of moral rights. Instead I want to highlight " +"how this gave a supposedly ethical, political and legal justification of " +"_the individualization_ of cultural commodities. Authorship began to be " +"associated inalienably to individuals and _a_ book started to mean _a_ " +"reader. But not only that, the possibilities of intellectual freedom were " +"reduced to a particular device: printed text." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:157 +msgid "" +"More freedom translated to the need of more and more printed material. More " +"freedom implied the requirement of bigger and bigger publishing industry. " +"More freedom entailed the expansionism of cultural capitalism. Books " +"switched to commodities and authors became its owners. Moral rights were " +"never about the freedom of readers, but who was the owner of that " +"commodities." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:163 +msgid "" +"Books stopped to be sources of oral and local public debate and became " +"private devices for an “universal” public debate: the Enlightenment. " +"Authorship put attribution in secondary place so individual ownership could " +"become its synonymous. A book for several readers and an author as an id for " +"an intellectual movement or institution became irrelevant against a book as " +"property for a particular reader---as material---and author---as speech." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:170 +msgid "" +"And we are sitting here reading all this shit without taking to account that " +"ones of the main wins of our neoliberal world is that we have been talking " +"about objects, individuals and production of wealth. Who the fucks are the " +"subjects who made all this publishing shit possible? Where the fucks are the " +"communities that in several ways make possible the rise of authors? For fuck " +"sake, why aren't we talking about the hidden costs of the maintenance of " +"means of production?" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:178 +msgid "" +"We aren't books and we aren't its authors. We aren't those individuals who " +"everybody are gonna relate to the books we are working on and, of course, we " +"lack of sense of community. We aren't the ones who enjoy all that wealth " +"generated by books production but for sure we are the ones who made all that " +"possible. _We are neglecting ourselves_." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:184 +msgid "" +"So don't come with those tales about the greatness of books for our culture, " +"the need of authorship to transfer wealth or to give attribution and how " +"important for our lives is the publishing production." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:188 +msgid "" +"* Did you know that books have been mainly devices of ideological\n" +" reproduction or at least mainly devices for cultural capitalism---most\n" +" best-selling books aren't critical thinking books that free\n" +" our minds, but text books with its hidden curriculum and\n" +" self-help and erotic books that keep reproducing basic exploitable\n" +" stereotypes?\n" +"* Did you realize that authorship haven't been the best way\n" +" to transfer wealth or give attribution---even now more than\n" +" before authors have to paid in order to be published at the\n" +" same time that in the practice they lose all rights?\n" +"* Did you see how we keep to be worry about production no matter\n" +" what---it doesn't matter that it would imply bigger chains\n" +" of free labor or, as I prefer to say: chains of exploitation\n" +" and “intellectual” slavery, because in order to be an\n" +" scholar you have to embrace publishing industry and maybe\n" +" even cultural capitalism?" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/003_dont_come.js:204 +msgid "" +"Please, don't come with those tales, we already reached more fertile fields " +"that can generate way better stories. " +msgstr "" diff --git a/content/po/nb/_about.po b/content/po/nb/_about.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..21aa8ae --- /dev/null +++ b/content/po/nb/_about.po @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +msgid "" +msgstr "" +"Project-Id-Version: _about 1.0\n" +"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya \n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-19 21:13-0600\n" +"MIME-Version: 1.0\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" +"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: \n" +"Language-Team: \n" +"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n" +"Last-Translator: \n" +"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" +"Language: nb_NO\n" + +#: content/md/_about.js:1 +msgid "# About" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_about.js:2 +msgid "" +"Hi, I am a dog-publisher---what a surprise, right? I am from Mexico and, as " +"you can see, English is not my first language. But whatever. My educational " +"background is on Philosophy, specifically Philosophy of Culture. My grade " +"studies focus on intellectual property---mainly copyright---, free culture, " +"free software and, of course, publishing. If you still want a name, call me " +"The Dog." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_about.js:8 +msgid "" +"This blog is about publishing and coding. But it _doesn't_ approach on " +"techniques that mades great code. Actually my programming skills are kind of " +"narrow. I have the following opinions. (a) If you use a computer to made " +"publications, not matter their output, _publishing is coding_. (b) " +"Publishing it is not just about developing software or skills, it is also a " +"tradition, a profession, an art but also a _method_. (c) To be able to " +"visualize that, we have to talk about how publishing implies and affects how " +"we do culture. (d) If we don't criticize and _self-criticize_ our work, we " +"are lost." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_about.js:18 +msgid "" +"In other terms, this blog is about what surrounds and what is supposed to be " +"the foundations of publishing. Yeah, of course you are gonna find technical " +"writing. However, it is just because on these days the spine of publishing " +"talks with zeros and ones. So, let start to think what is publishing " +"nowadays!" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_about.js:23 +msgid "" +"Some last words. I have to admit I don't feel comfortable about writing in " +"English. I find unfair that we, people from non-English spoken world, have " +"to use this language in order to be noticed. It makes me feel bad that we " +"are constantly translating what other persons are saying while just a few " +"homies translate from Spanish to English. So I decided to have at least a " +"bilingual blog. I write in English while I translate to Spanish---so I can " +"improve this skill; also: thanks +++S.O.+++ for help me to improve the " +"English version xoxo." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_about.js:32 +msgid "" +"That's not enough and it doesn't invite to collaboration. So this blog uses " +"`po` files for its contents. You can always collaborate in the translation " +"or edition of any language. Just visit Fork's page." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_about.js:36 +msgid "" +"That's all folks! And don't forget: fuck adds. Fuck spam. And fuck " +"proprietary culture. Freedom to the moon! " +msgstr "" diff --git a/content/po/nb/_contact.po b/content/po/nb/_contact.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..76d8a66 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/po/nb/_contact.po @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +msgid "" +msgstr "" +"Project-Id-Version: _contact 1.0\n" +"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya \n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-19 20:44-0600\n" +"MIME-Version: 1.0\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" +"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: \n" +"Language-Team: \n" +"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n" +"Last-Translator: \n" +"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" +"Language: nb_NO\n" + +#: content/md/_contact.js:1 +msgid "# Contact" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_contact.js:2 +msgid "You can reach me at:" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_contact.js:3 +msgid "" +"* [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/@_perroTuerto)\n" +"* hi[at]perrotuerto.blog" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_contact.js:5 +msgid "I even reply to the Nigerian Prince… " +msgstr "" diff --git a/content/po/nb/_donate.po b/content/po/nb/_donate.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ec8c07b --- /dev/null +++ b/content/po/nb/_donate.po @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +msgid "" +msgstr "" +"Project-Id-Version: _donate 1.0\n" +"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya \n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-19 20:18-0600\n" +"MIME-Version: 1.0\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" +"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: \n" +"Language-Team: \n" +"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n" +"Last-Translator: \n" +"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" +"Language: nb_NO\n" + +#: content/md/_donate.js:1 +msgid "# Donate" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_donate.js:2 +msgid "" +"_My server_ is actually an account powered by [Colima Hacklab](https://" +"gnusocial.net/hacklab)---thanks, dawgs, for host my crap!---. Also this blog " +"and all the free publishing events that we organize are done with free labor." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_donate.js:5 +msgid "So, if you can help us to keep working, that would be fucking great!" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_donate.js:7 +msgid "" +"Donate for some tacos with [+++ETH+++](https://etherscan.io/" +"address/0x39b0bf0cf86776060450aba23d1a6b47f5570486). {.no-indent .vertical-" +"space1}" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_donate.js:9 +msgid "" +"Donate for some dog food with [+++DOGE+++](https://dogechain.info/address/" +"DMbxM4nPLVbzTALv5n8G16TTzK4WDUhC7G). {.no-indent}" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_donate.js:11 +msgid "" +"Donate for some beers with [PayPal](https://www.paypal.me/perrotuerto). {.no-" +"indent} " +msgstr "" diff --git a/content/po/nb/_fork.po b/content/po/nb/_fork.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..81beeba --- /dev/null +++ b/content/po/nb/_fork.po @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +msgid "" +msgstr "" +"Project-Id-Version: _fork 1.0\n" +"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya \n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-19 21:21-0600\n" +"MIME-Version: 1.0\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" +"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: \n" +"Language-Team: \n" +"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n" +"Last-Translator: \n" +"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" +"Language: nb_NO\n" + +#: content/md/_fork.js:1 +msgid "# Fork" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_fork.js:2 +msgid "" +"All the content is under Licencia Editorial Abierta y Libre (+++LEAL+++). " +"You can read it [here](https://gitlab.com/NikaZhenya/licencia-editorial-" +"abierta-y-libre)." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_fork.js:4 +msgid "" +"“Licencia Editorial Abierta y Libre” is translated to “Open and Free " +"Publishing License.” “+++LEAL+++” is the acronym but also means “loyal” in " +"Spanish." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_fork.js:7 +msgid "" +"With +++LEAL+++ you are free to use, copy, reedit, modify, share or sell any " +"of this content under the following conditions:" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_fork.js:9 +msgid "" +"* Anything produced with this content must be under some type of +++LEAL++" +"+.\n" +"* All files---editable or final formats---must be on public access.\n" +"* The sale can't be the only way to acquire the final product.\n" +"* The generated surplus value can't be used for exploitation of labor.\n" +"* The content can't be used for +++AI+++ or data mining.\n" +"* The use of the content must not harm any collaborator." +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_fork.js:15 +msgid "Now, you can fork this shit:" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_fork.js:16 +msgid "" +"* [GitLab](https://gitlab.com/NikaZhenya/publishing-is-coding)\n" +"* [GitHub](https://github.com/NikaZhenya/publishing-is-coding)\n" +"* [My server](http://git.cliteratu.re/publishing-is-coding/)\n" +msgstr "" diff --git a/content/po/nb/_links.po b/content/po/nb/_links.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fb5e796 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/po/nb/_links.po @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +msgid "" +msgstr "" +"Project-Id-Version: _links 1.0\n" +"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Nika Zhenya \n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-20 15:35-0600\n" +"MIME-Version: 1.0\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" +"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: \n" +"Language-Team: \n" +"X-Generator: Poedit 2.2.1\n" +"Last-Translator: \n" +"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" +"Language: nb_NO\n" + +#: content/md/_links.js:1 +msgid "# Links" +msgstr "" + +#: content/md/_links.js:2 +msgid "" +"* [Pecas: publishing tools](https://pecas.perrotuerto.blog/)\n" +"* [+++TED+++: digital publishing workshop](https://ted.perrotuerto.blog/)\n" +"* [_Digital Publishing as a Methodology for Global Publishing_](https://ed." +"perrotuerto.blog/)\n" +"* [Colima Hacklab](https://gnusocial.net/hacklab)\n" +"* [Mariana Eguaras's blog](https://marianaeguaras.com/blog/)\n" +"* [Zinenauta](https://zinenauta.copiona.com/)\n" +"* [In Defense of Free Software](https://endefensadelsl.org/)\n" +msgstr ""