Seguimos con cambios en 6
This commit is contained in:
parent
2172748b83
commit
21c15a6f80
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ distinctive relationship with her own work. Without some metaphysics
|
||||||
or theological conceptions about cultural production, this special
|
or theological conceptions about cultural production, this special
|
||||||
relation is difficult to prove---but that is another story.
|
relation is difficult to prove---but that is another story.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
![Locke and Hegel drinking tea while discussing about several topics on Nothingland… Except +++IP+++, that is a contemporary topic far different to what they talked about.](../../../img/p006_i001.png)
|
![Locke and Hegel drinking tea while discussing several topics on Nothingland… Except +++IP+++, that is a contemporary topic far different to what they talked about.](../../../img/p006_i001.png)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
From copyfight, copyleft and copyfarleft movements, a lot of people
|
From copyfight, copyleft and copyfarleft movements, a lot of people
|
||||||
have argued that this argument hides the fact that most authors
|
have argued that this argument hides the fact that most authors
|
||||||
|
@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ that doesn't rely on the actual producers, cultural phenomena or world issues…
|
||||||
And it also shows that there are [librarians](https://blog.archive.org/2020/03/30/internet-archive-responds-why-we-released-the-national-emergency-library)
|
And it also shows that there are [librarians](https://blog.archive.org/2020/03/30/internet-archive-responds-why-we-released-the-national-emergency-library)
|
||||||
and [researchers](https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-03-03/covid-19-open-science)
|
and [researchers](https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-03-03/covid-19-open-science)
|
||||||
fighting in favor of public interests; +++AKA+++, how important
|
fighting in favor of public interests; +++AKA+++, how important
|
||||||
are libraries and open access today and how they can't be replaced
|
libraries and open access are today and how they can't be replaced
|
||||||
by (online) bookstores or subscription-based research.
|
by (online) bookstores or subscription-based research.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I find it very pretentious if [some authors](https://www.authorsguild.org/industry-advocacy/internet-archives-uncontrolled-digital-lending)
|
I would find it very pretentious if [some authors](https://www.authorsguild.org/industry-advocacy/internet-archives-uncontrolled-digital-lending)
|
||||||
and [some publishers](https://publishers.org/news/comment-from-aap-president-and-ceo-maria-pallante-on-the-internet-archives-national-emergency-library)
|
and [some publishers](https://publishers.org/news/comment-from-aap-president-and-ceo-maria-pallante-on-the-internet-archives-national-emergency-library)
|
||||||
didn't agree with this _temporal_ openness of their work. But let's not miss the
|
didn't agree with this _temporal_ openness of their work. But let's not miss the
|
||||||
point: this global pandemic has shown how easily it is for publishers
|
point: this global pandemic has shown how easily it is for publishers
|
||||||
|
@ -75,12 +75,12 @@ case the authors, but more generally and secularly the producers.
|
||||||
The copyleft holders---a kind of cool copyright holder that
|
The copyleft holders---a kind of cool copyright holder that
|
||||||
hacked copyright laws---also defends their interest in a similar
|
hacked copyright laws---also defends their interest in a similar
|
||||||
way, but instead of authors, they talk about users and instead
|
way, but instead of authors, they talk about users and instead
|
||||||
of profits they supposedly defend freedom.
|
of profits, they supposedly defend freedom.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There is a huge difference between each of them, but I just want
|
There is a huge difference between each of them, but I just want
|
||||||
to denote how they talk about people in order to defend their
|
to denote how they talk about people in order to defend their
|
||||||
interests. I wouldn't put them in the same sack if it wasn't
|
interests. I wouldn't put them in the same sack if it wasn't
|
||||||
because of two issues.
|
because of these? two issues.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Some copyleft holders were so annoying in defending Stallman.
|
Some copyleft holders were so annoying in defending Stallman.
|
||||||
_Dudes_, at least from here we don't reduce the free software movement
|
_Dudes_, at least from here we don't reduce the free software movement
|
||||||
|
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ important he is or was. Criticizing his actions wasn't synonymous with
|
||||||
throwing away what this movement has done---what we have done!---,
|
throwing away what this movement has done---what we have done!---,
|
||||||
as a lot of you tried to mitigate the issue: “Oh, but he is not
|
as a lot of you tried to mitigate the issue: “Oh, but he is not
|
||||||
the movement, we shouldn't have made a big issue about that.” His
|
the movement, we shouldn't have made a big issue about that.” His
|
||||||
and your attitude is the fucking issue. He and you have made it
|
and your attitude is the fucking issue. Together you have made it
|
||||||
very clear how narrow both views are. Stallman fucked it up
|
very clear how narrow both views are. Stallman fucked it up
|
||||||
and was behaving very immaturely by thinking the movement is
|
and was behaving very immaturely by thinking the movement is
|
||||||
or was thanks to him---we also have our own stories about his
|
or was thanks to him---we also have our own stories about his
|
||||||
|
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ they forgot that “freedom wants to be free.”
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Instead, they have tried to give formal definitions of
|
Instead, they have tried to give formal definitions of
|
||||||
software freedom. Don't get me wrong, definitions are a good
|
software freedom. Don't get me wrong, definitions are a good
|
||||||
way to plan and understand a phenomenon. But besides its formality
|
way to plan and understand a phenomenon. But besides its formality,
|
||||||
it is problematic to bind others to your own definitions,
|
it is problematic to bind others to your own definitions,
|
||||||
mainly when you say the movement is about and for them.
|
mainly when you say the movement is about and for them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ is actually an array of worlds and if people sometimes behave
|
||||||
one way or the other, of course the notion of freedom is gonna
|
one way or the other, of course the notion of freedom is gonna
|
||||||
vary.
|
vary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
With freedom's different meanings we could try to reduce its diversity ? > The diversity of freedom definitions.
|
With freedom's different meanings we could try to reduce its diversity
|
||||||
so it could be embedded in any context or we could try something else.
|
so it could be embedded in any context or we could try something else.
|
||||||
I dunno, maybe we could make software freedom an interoperable
|
I dunno, maybe we could make software freedom an interoperable
|
||||||
concept that fits each of our worlds or we could just stop trying
|
concept that fits each of our worlds or we could just stop trying
|
||||||
|
@ -130,15 +130,15 @@ The copyleft institutions I mentioned and many other companies
|
||||||
that are proud to support the copyleft movement tend to be blind
|
that are proud to support the copyleft movement tend to be blind
|
||||||
about this. I am talking from my experiences, my battles and
|
about this. I am talking from my experiences, my battles and
|
||||||
my struggles when I decided to use copyfarleft licenses in most
|
my struggles when I decided to use copyfarleft licenses in most
|
||||||
parts of my work. Instead of having support from representatives
|
parts of my work. Instead of receiving support from institutional
|
||||||
of this institutions, I first received warnings: “That freedom
|
representatives, I first received warnings: “That freedom
|
||||||
you are talking about isn't freedom.” Afterwards, when I sought
|
you are talking about isn't freedom.” Afterwards, when I sought
|
||||||
infrastructure support, I got refusals: “You are invited to use
|
infrastructure support, I got refusals: “You are invited to use
|
||||||
our code in your server, but we can't provide you hosting because
|
our code in your server, but we can't provide you hosting because
|
||||||
your licenses aren't free.” Dawgs, if I could, I wouldn't look
|
your licenses aren't free.” Dawgs, if I could, I wouldn't look
|
||||||
for your help in the first place, duh.
|
for your help in the first place, duh.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Thanks to a lot of Latin Americans hackers and pirates, I am little
|
Thanks to a lot of Latin American hackers and pirates, I am little
|
||||||
by little building my and our own infrastructure. But I know
|
by little building my and our own infrastructure. But I know
|
||||||
this help is actually a privilege: for many years I couldn't
|
this help is actually a privilege: for many years I couldn't
|
||||||
execute many projects or ideas only because I didn't have
|
execute many projects or ideas only because I didn't have
|
||||||
|
@ -148,33 +148,34 @@ learning.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(There is a pedagogical deficiency in the free software movement
|
(There is a pedagogical deficiency in the free software movement
|
||||||
that makes people think that writing documentation and praising
|
that makes people think that writing documentation and praising
|
||||||
self-taught learning is enough. From my point of view it is more
|
self-taught learning is enough. From my point of view, it is more
|
||||||
about the production of a self-image in how a hacker or a pirate
|
about the production of a self-image in how a hacker or a pirate
|
||||||
_should be_. Plus, it's fucking scary when you realize how ? > It is scary to see that copyleft movement is manly, hierarchical and so on.
|
_should be_. Plus, it's fucking scary when you realize how
|
||||||
manly, hierarchical and meritocratic this movement tends to be.)
|
manly, hierarchical and meritocratic this movement tends to be.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
According to copyleft folks, my notion of software freedom isn't
|
According to copyleft folks, my notion of software freedom isn't
|
||||||
free because copyfarleft licenses prevents _people_ to use software. ? > Prevents, yep!
|
free because copyfarleft licenses prevents _people_ from using software.
|
||||||
This is a very common criticism of any copyfarleft license. And
|
This is a very common criticism of any copyfarleft license. And
|
||||||
it is also a very paradoxical one.
|
it is also a very paradoxical one.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Between the free software movement and open source initiative there
|
Between the free software movement and open source initiative, there
|
||||||
has been a disagreement about the ought to inherit the same type ? > Free software implies to use the same license in your software that the free software you are using for its development.
|
has been a disagreement about who ought to inherit the same type of
|
||||||
of license, like the General Public License. For the free software
|
license, like the General Public License. For the free software
|
||||||
movement this clause ensures that software will always be free.
|
movement, this clause ensures that software will always be free.
|
||||||
According to the open source initiative this clause is actually
|
According to the open source initiative, this clause is actually
|
||||||
a counter-freedom because it doesn't allow people to decide which
|
a counter-freedom because it doesn't allow people to decide which
|
||||||
license to use and it also isn't very attractive for enterprise
|
license to use and it also isn't very attractive for enterprise
|
||||||
entrepreneurship. Let's not forget that both sides agree that
|
entrepreneurship. Let's not forget that both sides agree that
|
||||||
the market is are essential for technology development.
|
the market is are essential for technology development.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Free software supporters tend to vanish the discussion by declaring
|
Free software supporters tend to vanish the discussion by declaring
|
||||||
that open source defenders don't understand the social implication
|
that open source defenders don't understand the social implication
|
||||||
of this hereditary clause or that they have different interests
|
of this hereditary clause or that they have different interests
|
||||||
and ways to change technology development. So it's kind of paradoxical
|
and ways to change technology development. So it's kind of paradoxical
|
||||||
that these folks see the anti-capitalist clause of copyfarleft
|
that these folks see the anti-capitalist clause of copyfarleft
|
||||||
licenses as a counter-freedom. Or they don't understand its implications
|
licenses as a counter-freedom. Or they don't understand its implications
|
||||||
or they don't perceive that copyfarleft doesn't talk about technology
|
or perceive that copyfarleft doesn't talk about technology
|
||||||
development in its insolation, but in its relationship with politics,
|
development in its insolation, but in its relationship with politics,
|
||||||
society and economy.
|
society and economy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ debate. Third, I think we should focus on the ways we can work
|
||||||
together, instead of paying attention to what could divide us.
|
together, instead of paying attention to what could divide us.
|
||||||
Finally, I don't think these criticisms are wrong, but incomplete:
|
Finally, I don't think these criticisms are wrong, but incomplete:
|
||||||
the definition of software freedom has inherited the philosophical problem
|
the definition of software freedom has inherited the philosophical problem
|
||||||
of how we can define and what the definition
|
of how we define and what the definition
|
||||||
of freedom implies.
|
of freedom implies.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
That doesn't mean I don't care about this discussion. Actually,
|
That doesn't mean I don't care about this discussion. Actually,
|
||||||
|
@ -194,7 +195,7 @@ it's a topic I'm very familiar with. Copyright has locked
|
||||||
me out with paywalls for technology and knowledge access, copyleft has
|
me out with paywalls for technology and knowledge access, copyleft has
|
||||||
kept me away with “licensewalls” with the same effects. So let's take a moment
|
kept me away with “licensewalls” with the same effects. So let's take a moment
|
||||||
to see how free the freedom is that the copyleft institutions
|
to see how free the freedom is that the copyleft institutions
|
||||||
are preaching
|
are preaching.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
According to _Open Source Software & The Department of Defense_
|
According to _Open Source Software & The Department of Defense_
|
||||||
(+++DoD+++), The +++U.S. DoD+++ is one of the biggest consumers
|
(+++DoD+++), The +++U.S. DoD+++ is one of the biggest consumers
|
||||||
|
@ -250,7 +251,7 @@ freedom relies on strong institutions and the capacity of own
|
||||||
property or capitalize knowledge. The same ones which have been
|
property or capitalize knowledge. The same ones which have been
|
||||||
trying to explain that the economic models they try to “teach”
|
trying to explain that the economic models they try to “teach”
|
||||||
us don't work or we doubt them because of their side effects.
|
us don't work or we doubt them because of their side effects.
|
||||||
Crowdfunding isn't easy because our cultural production here
|
Crowdfunding isn't easy here because our cultural production
|
||||||
is heavily dependent on government aids and policies, instead
|
is heavily dependent on government aids and policies, instead
|
||||||
of the private or public sectors. And donations aren't a good idea
|
of the private or public sectors. And donations aren't a good idea
|
||||||
because of the hidden interests they could have and the economic
|
because of the hidden interests they could have and the economic
|
||||||
|
@ -273,21 +274,25 @@ and its economic models.
|
||||||
Those copyleft institutions that care so much about “user
|
Those copyleft institutions that care so much about “user
|
||||||
freedoms” actually haven't been explicit about how +++FOSS+++
|
freedoms” actually haven't been explicit about how +++FOSS+++
|
||||||
is helping shape a world where a lot of us don't fit in. It
|
is helping shape a world where a lot of us don't fit in. It
|
||||||
had to be right-wing think tanks, the ones that declares the relevance
|
had to be right-wing think tanks, the ones that declare the relevance
|
||||||
of +++FOSS+++ for warfare, intelligence, security and authoritarian regimes,
|
of +++FOSS+++ for warfare, intelligence, security and authoritarian regimes,
|
||||||
while these institutions have been making many efforts in justifying
|
while these institutions have been making many efforts in justifying
|
||||||
its way of understanding cultural production as a commodification
|
its way of understanding cultural production as a commodification
|
||||||
of its political capacity. They have shown that in their pursuit of
|
of its political capacity.
|
||||||
government and corporate adoption of +++FOSS+++, they talk ? > They talk about “software user freedoms” but they actually refer to “freedom of use software”, no matter the objective.
|
They have shown that in their pursuit of
|
||||||
about users whereas their policies are designed to defend _use_.
|
government and corporate adoption of +++FOSS+++, they talk about “software user freedoms”
|
||||||
|
but actually refer to “freedom of use software”, no matter the objective.
|
||||||
|
..........about users whereas their policies are designed to defend _use_.
|
||||||
They aren't defending “software user freedom” but “freedom of use software”,
|
They aren't defending “software user freedom” but “freedom of use software”,
|
||||||
no matter who is the user and for what it is been used, if it
|
no matter who the user is or what it has been used for, if it
|
||||||
favors their interests.
|
favors their interests.
|
||||||
|
THIS PARAGRAPH NEEDS WORK
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There is some sort of cognitive dissonance that influences many copyleft
|
|
||||||
supporters to treat others harshly, those who just want some kind ? > They treat other users like shit if they don't use of fit in their conception of freedom.
|
There is a sort of cognitive dissonance that influences many copyleft
|
||||||
of aid over the argument about which license or product is free
|
supporters to treat others harshly, those who just want some aid
|
||||||
or not. But in the meantime, they don't defy and some of them
|
in the argument over which license or product is free
|
||||||
|
or not. But in the meantime, they don't defy, and some of them
|
||||||
even embrace the adoption of +++FOSS+++ for any kind of corporation,
|
even embrace the adoption of +++FOSS+++ for any kind of corporation,
|
||||||
it doesn't matter if it exploits its employees, surveils its users,
|
it doesn't matter if it exploits its employees, surveils its users,
|
||||||
helps to undermine democratic institutions or is part of a killing
|
helps to undermine democratic institutions or is part of a killing
|
||||||
|
@ -304,22 +309,21 @@ related to users. Instead, they are four different use cases.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The difference isn't a minor thing. A _use case_ neutralizes and
|
The difference isn't a minor thing. A _use case_ neutralizes and
|
||||||
reifies the subject of the action. In its dilution the interest
|
reifies the subject of the action. In its dilution the interest
|
||||||
of the subject becomes irrelevant. The four freedoms doesn't
|
of the subject becomes irrelevant. The four freedoms don't
|
||||||
ban the use of a program for selfish, slayer or authoritarian
|
ban the use of a program for selfish, slayer or authoritarian
|
||||||
uses. Neither does it encourage them. By the romantic idea of
|
uses. Neither do they encourage them. By the romantic idea of
|
||||||
a common good, it is easy to think that the freedoms of run,
|
a common good, it is easy to think that the freedoms of run,
|
||||||
study, redistribute and improve a program are synonymous with a
|
study, redistribute and improve a program are synonymous with a
|
||||||
mechanism that improves welfare and democracy. But because these
|
mechanism that improves welfare and democracy. But because these
|
||||||
four freedoms don't relate to any user interest and instead
|
four freedoms don't relate to any user interest and instead
|
||||||
talk about the interest of using software and the adoption
|
talk about the interest of using software and the adoption
|
||||||
of an “open” cultural production, it hides the fact that sometimes
|
of an “open” cultural production, it hides the fact that
|
||||||
the freedom of use goes against and uses subjects.
|
the freedom of use sometimes goes against and uses subjects.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So the argument that copyfarleft denies people the use of software
|
So the argument that copyfarleft denies people the use of software
|
||||||
only makes sense between two confusions. First, the personification ? > They say they defend people freedom, but institutions aren't people.
|
only makes sense between two misconceptions. First, the personification
|
||||||
of institutions---like ? > I really fucked it up here, right? I rewrote this shit.
|
of institutions---like the ones that feed authoritarian regimes, perpetuate labor exploitation
|
||||||
the ones that feed authoritarian regimes, perpetuate labor exploitation
|
or surveil its users---with their policies sometimes restricting freedom
|
||||||
or surveil its users---which sometimes their policies restrict freedom
|
|
||||||
or access _to people_. Second, the assumption that freedoms over software
|
or access _to people_. Second, the assumption that freedoms over software
|
||||||
use cases is equal to the freedom of its users.
|
use cases is equal to the freedom of its users.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -328,8 +332,8 @@ cases freedoms over users freedoms, we are far beyond the typical
|
||||||
discussions about cultural production. I find it very hard to defend
|
discussions about cultural production. I find it very hard to defend
|
||||||
my support of freedom if my work enables some uses that could
|
my support of freedom if my work enables some uses that could
|
||||||
go against others' freedoms. This is of course the freedom
|
go against others' freedoms. This is of course the freedom
|
||||||
dilemma about the [paradox of tolerance](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance). But my main conflict is when
|
dilemma about the [paradox of tolerance](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance).
|
||||||
copyleft supporters boast about their defense of users freedoms
|
But my main conflict is when copyleft supporters boast about their defense of users freedoms
|
||||||
while they micromanage others' software freedom definitions
|
while they micromanage others' software freedom definitions
|
||||||
and, in the meantime, they turn their backs to the gray, dark
|
and, in the meantime, they turn their backs to the gray, dark
|
||||||
or red areas of what is implicit in the freedom they safeguard.
|
or red areas of what is implicit in the freedom they safeguard.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue